Volume 5 | September 2022
Human-Centered. Solutions Driven.
Inside This Issue
Your Project Management Resourcing Strategy
By Sandalwood Team
In a rapidly changing global economy some common concerns are arising. These include:
- Increased commodity prices
- Available supply vs. Consumer demand
- Limited access to technical resources
While there is no solving the world’s inflationary problems (or for that matter, influence the laws of Supply and Demand), there are some very interesting solutions to the lack of technical resources.
When experiencing a technical worker shortage, we begin with this simple question:
Have you thought about different ways to organize your work?
This question can be very challenging for many companies, who are often only comfortable utilizing existing job descriptions or established work practices. This is particularly true for technical professions (i.e., Engineering, Programming, etc.), where managers often default to a “Plug-and-Play” mentality when assigning or replacing resources.
In a tight labor market (such as the one we are experiencing today), trying to find a “plug-and-play” resource can be frustrating, and honestly, quite impossible. As a result, we are seeing multiple instances of delayed programs, halted investments, and even shuttered production due to lack of technical resources.
Something has to change! Is it possible to look at dividing work differently?!?!
Why should we organize our work differently?
Let’s begin with the traditional Product Development Process:
- Incorporate Customer Requirements into a Technical Specification
- Design a Product and/or Service to meet (or exceed) the Technical Specification
- Test the Product and/or Service to ensure that the Technical Specification was met
- Support the launch of the Product/Service into the Market
- Monitor the quality of the in-market Product/Service
- Iterate the design of the Product/Service to improve quality and/or reduce costs
In most cases, supplementing and/or replacing the technical aspects of the project is not the issue. Rather, the source of the problem lies in several areas:
- Consistency of documentation and/or loss of information throughout the process
- Coordination and alignment of resources across multiple functions and countries
Previously, this problem was solved in the most straightforward method: Hire more Engineers! However, given the lack of available, technical resources, this solution is no longer a possibility.
A Change of Mindset
New Solution: Organize the work (differently)! Review the work performed by an engineer, and place the work into two distinct “buckets”:
- Technically-driven (e.g. drawings, specifications, testing results, analysis, etc.)
- Process-driven (e.g. Planning, Time/Issue/Problem/Change Management, Risk Assessments, etc.)
Following that review, assign the technical work to an Engineer and the process work to the Project Manager. The Engineer and the Project Manager work together, as a team, toward a common goal.
This type of work arrangement has been beneficial for many reasons:
- A Project Manager can immediately relieve work from an overburdened technical resource
- A Project Manager can improve the alignment and coordination of disparate and/or remote resources
- A Project Manager can be developed and deployed much faster than a “Plug-and-Play” technical resource
- A Project Manager can allow scarce technical resources to be shared between multiple programs and projects
What other new solutions are waiting, we wonder?